- Related posts on DC bernie
- Entrecomics » Hágase el murciélago. La versión Steranko
- Related posts on healthcare DC
- Obama Budget Spending Care Priorities President American Health …
- antitrust in healthcare - dc
- Related posts on of healthcare
- Recap of World Innovation Forum June 8-9, 2010 « OnInnovation Blog
- MD-Writer Blog » Blog Archive » The Medical Home Model of …
- Nothing to Fear … « The Unofficial View
Related posts:
{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }
That’s all you got? You’re not a corporate whore. You’re a retarded corporate whore, since you wrote a retarded/completely false paragraph about the difference between an investment and bailout. LOL.
Senator Sanders is the man!
the destruction or lessening of human life for money - a simple number with no intrisic value - is an act of collective insanity, which makes capitalism a mental as well as physical pathology.
It’s only a collective insanity if you were to have no use for it. An individual collecting it to use to save a life or change a life, for example, certainly isn’t an example of insanity. The worship of money is insane, the collection of it most certainly is not.
stop thinking so narrowly, it is annoying. Im speaking of the IDEOLOGY behind capitalism, not simply the collection of money. The IDEOLOGY of capitalism is pathology, because there is no physical link between the availability of resources and the availability of currency. I could print the equivalent of 100 trillion US dollars in every major currency and it will not change the total ammount of food or water on the earth.
I remember my first beer when I was your age too.
#1: YOU, personally, couldn’t print currency because you most likely don’t know how to and it’s illegal to do so and you would eventually be caught. It is true that currency does not change the total amount of food or water available on earth but to base your argument on this rationale is meritless for the simple reason that currency DOES change the availability of food and water to particular segments of people. A poor person does not have the same access to these items that a rich person has.
Precisely, you have proven my argument. Because “..currency does not change the total amount of food or water available on earth..” yet “..currency DOES change the availability of food and water to particular segments of people.” To allow a number with no intrinsic value to affect the lives of people through access to resources which there are plenty of is a definition of pathology. And please, when you were my age? I have a Ph. D in philosophy, which is why your excessively empirical
argument is so easy to disprove. I am still in shock that i am debating on youtube. I hope you have learned from my argument as i have learned from yours. Farewell.
Firstly, any previous comments I’ve made on here are more than a month old and I have no interest in looking them up to see what the discussion at that time was and with whom it was against. Secondly, I have no idea who you are. Thirdly, I have no idea what point you are trying to get across but it certainly doesn’t interest me nor has anything to do with me. Fourthly, didn’t you know everyone on youtube has a Phd? LOL. Your argument was meritless and served no purpose.
One last point is this: you keep mentioning that money has no intrinsic value - that is incorrect. Maybe you and your online PhD need to look up the definition of intrinsic but in any event, in the stock market, for example, the intrinsic value of money is backed by the market price of shares trading that are represented by the physical assets held against the total liabilities it owes.
the comment i replied to was 21 hours old, my ph.d was earned at a college graduate school, and debating you is a waste of time.
No, the comment you initially replied to was 1 month old and I couldn’t care less where you obtained your PhD or if you even have one. If you feel that “debating” me is a waste of your time, then simply don’t engage the debate.
How much MONEY did it cost you to receive your online PhD? It’s always amusing when someone argues the validity of currency when he himself has relied on it to a large degree. Without it, it would be impossible for you to receive a PhD making your argument of whether currency has any intrinsic value meritless.
“Without it, it would be impossible for you to receive a PhD ”
A large component of education is just information. It is archaic and retrograde to limit the access to educational information based on money, Education material used for any degree should be free and accessible online. Capitalism’s fetish on monetary perspective beyond all other considerations is short sighted.
Bravo Senator Sanders. Thank you for your efforts to reform health care. Please keep up the good fight, Sen. Sanders.
@capitalismforever A collection of anything, when it becomes more important then people is in fact insanity. You are putting some imaginary value on life that does not really exist accept in a collective mindset. Love, Peace, and compassion are all strengths that have a byproduct of wealth and well-being on people. You dont need to focus on aquring things, you just need to focus on helping people and whatever you need will be a byproduct of what you do.
@trinsic1 I absolutely agree with your statement. We have no disagreement in that.
public optioin, public option, public option NOW